Menu ≡ ╳
Clinical study designs are increasingly complex. A growing number of studies are using adaptive designs and require decisions during the conduct of the study. At the same time, the amount of data, the variety of data types and the time pressure for decision making is growing. During study conduct, scientists are under high time pressure and need to manage a multitude of tasks, such as medical data review, signal detection on study and project level, conducting preliminary analysis, preparing for database closure and working on publications and presentations.
Above all, the clinical scientists are expected to drive the innovation in pharmaceutical drug development with new study designs, new assays and new ways to look at data. Innovative thinking requires time and a mind at ease, a contradicting requirement in the busy world of clinical studies. Since the evaluation of data is very often done with sub-optimal tools and processes requiring a lot of manual work, time and space that is needed to become creative and develop new ideas is lost
An effective and streamlined data flow from data capture to decision making can support the scientists in their intrinsic key responsibility to innovate drug development. The specific deliverables of an improved data flow must focus on two aspects:
Such improvements need to be achieved on the back of a high economic pressures for further improved operational efficiency and continuously high levels of data quality and regulatory compliance.
RETHINKING THE FLOW OF DATA
Addressing the scientists’ needs according to these requirements is a tall order. It requires a comprehensive approach looking at the systems, data standards and business processes in a combined fashion. Standardization is the underlying common characteristics to all of these because it offers re-usability and reduced time and effort.
Specifically, there are 3 topics that require consideration:
Finally, all functions involved need to be absolutely clear on their contribution and responsibilities across the entire data flow. In addition, there needs to be a clear distinction between mandatory process steps and deliverables versus areas where flexibility is possible and welcome.
SIMPLIFYING THE DATA FLOW AND TOOLS FOR CLINICAL STUDIES
The key design principles for the future system landscape was to minimize the number of tools and databases, eliminate redundant data storage where possible, and use the same tools or platforms across functions. The different options for the data flows needs to be reduced to one preferred way of working: on-line EDC data capture and access to clinical data via a graphical data review tool.
Tools and Platforms:
PROVIDING SPEEDY ACCESS TO STUDY DATA
A key requirement for clinical scientists is early and speedy access to study data. This can be greatly supported by the use of global data standards. A Gartner report showed that CDISC data standards can reduce the time for study setup by up to 80% and the time for data extraction into a usable format by up to 50%. Such time savings translate directly into the thinking time and space for scientists for decision making.
The redesigned data flow offers a variety of components for early and speedy access to study data.
STANDARDIZING DATA FORMATS AND DISPLAYS
Data standardization supports the fast database setup and enables a fast data flow during study conduct. Beyond that, standards are extremely valuable when it comes to integrated analysis reaching across studies. Finally, standards are a strong enabler for presenting data in an interpretable fashion. Downstream tools need to find variable names and types based on standardized names, and scientists are becoming used to this nomenclature.
For the re-designed data flow, CDISC data standards play a key role:
NEW RESPONSIBILITIES FOR CLINICAL SCIENCE
Early and speedy access to clinical data during study conduct is a privilege which comes with responsibilities.
In order to work with the data, the clinical scientists need to acquaint themselves with the concept of data models. As a prerequisite to data exploration, the meaning and interpretation of the variables in data sets needs to be understood.
When receiving data early during study conduct, it is inherent that the data are not clean. This should not cause friction in a team but should be understood by all parties involved.
Clinical scientists need to apply the concept of data exploration: first comes a question, then the data are explored using an adequate tool to get an answer to the question. Following the concept of question and answer should help to look at data in a structured manner, not to get lost in the jungle of data.
The key elements to enable scientific innovation in drug development are
The daily business in drug development, however, frequently does not provide room for both, data availability and thinking time. Correspondingly, an improved data flow facilitated by an integrated data management platform coupled with data visualization tools can achieve the above while maintaining the overall efficiency and regulatory compliance.
At MaxisIT, we clearly understand strategic priorities within clinical R&D, and we can resonate that well with our similar experiences of implementing solutions for improving Clinical Development Portfolio via an integrated platform-based approach; which delivers timely access to study specific as well as standardized and aggregated clinical trial operations as well as patient data, allows efficient trial oversight via remote monitoring, statistically assessed controls, data quality management, clinical reviews, and statistical computing. Moreover, it provides capabilities for planned vs. actual trending, optimization, as well as for fraud detection and risk-based monitoring. MaxisIT’s Integrated Technology Platform is a purpose-built solution, which helps Pharmaceutical & Life sciences industry by “Empowering Business Stakeholders with Integrated Computing, and Self-service Dashboards in the strategically externalized enterprise environment with major focus on the core clinical operations data as well as clinical information assets; which allows improved control over externalized, CROs and partners driven, clinical ecosystem; and enable in-time decision support, continuous monitoring over regulatory compliance, and greater operational efficiency at a measurable rate”.